Active Directory Security Audit
Active Directory is the heart of IT infrastructure — it controls access to all resources. AD environments grow organically over the years: accounts, groups, delegations, GPOs — rarely cleaned up. Our audit with BloodHound, PingCastle and Purple Knight identifies hidden attack paths and excessive permissions, delivering a prioritized AD hardening plan.
Describe your scope — your account manager will reply within 24 hours.
- Free quote

What is an Active Directory Security Audit?
An Active Directory Security Audit is a deep analysis of AD configuration, permissions, and vulnerabilities — the central identity management system in most organizations. It covers AD structure analysis, GPO policies, RBAC permissions, Kerberos configuration, delegations, group membership, privilege escalation paths (attack paths) and hardening. AD compromise means full takeover of the organization.
Contact your account manager
Discuss Active Directory Security Audit with your dedicated account manager.

Hidden privilege escalation paths lead straight to Domain Admin
AD audit with attack path mapping and hardening roadmap
Enumeration
BloodHound, LDAP queries, GPO, Kerberos, delegations, trusts
Attack path analysis
Shortest path to Domain Admin, Kerberoasting, DCSync, Golden Ticket
Hardening roadmap
Prioritized actions: Tiered Administration, GPO, monitoring
What is an Active Directory Security Audit?
An Active Directory Security Audit is a deep analysis of AD configuration, permissions, and vulnerabilities — the central identity management system in most organizations. It covers AD structure analysis, GPO policies, RBAC permissions, Kerberos configuration, delegations, group membership and privilege escalation paths (attack paths).
| Attribute | Value |
|---|---|
| Tools | BloodHound, PingCastle, Purple Knight |
| Scope | Configuration, permissions, attack paths |
| Duration | 1-4 weeks |
| Deliverable | Attack path map + hardening roadmap |
Active Directory is the heart of IT infrastructure — it controls access to all resources. AD compromise means full takeover of the organization.
Hidden paths to Domain Admin
AD environments grow organically over the years: accounts, groups, delegations, GPOs are added — but rarely cleaned up. Over time, a complex web of permissions emerges with hundreds of non-obvious escalation paths. An administrator with permissions to a single server can, through a chain of delegations, obtain Domain Admin.
Without an AD audit:
- You don’t know the privilege escalation paths to Domain Admin
- Service accounts vulnerable to Kerberoasting remain unsecured
- Unconstrained delegation enables TGT ticket theft
- Excessive permissions accumulate for years without verification
- You don’t meet NIS2/ISO 27001 requirements for identity management
BloodHound + nFlo experts = complete threat map
We use specialized tools (BloodHound, PingCastle, Purple Knight) to analyze attack paths and AD configuration. We manually verify: GPO, delegations, group membership, Kerberos, trusts. We identify Tier 0 assets and verify their protection.
What you get:
- Attack path map (BloodHound): privilege escalation visualization to Domain Admin
- AD security scoring: PingCastle assessment with benchmark comparison
- Technical report: AD configuration, GPO, delegations, Kerberos, trusts, attack paths
- Permissions audit: group membership, delegations, service accounts, admin accounts
- AD hardening plan: Tiered Administration, GPO hardening, Kerberos hardening, monitoring
- IT workshop: attack path demonstration and remediation walkthrough
Microsoft 365 and Entra ID tenant compromise review
Microsoft describes token theft as an attack in which a threat actor replays tokens issued to a user — even if that user has completed multifactor authentication (MFA). Microsoft Threat Intelligence has documented a campaign in which attackers, after hijacking a session, created inbox rules that hid correspondence with the fraud target, and, according to Microsoft, the Storm-2372 group registered actor-controlled devices in Entra ID. That is why the audit checks your organization’s tenant for the traces that the Microsoft playbook lists as signs of persistence:
- Sessions and tokens: traces of token replay after a successful MFA sign-in (sign-ins from unusual locations and devices), and whether Conditional Access uses Token Protection, which according to Microsoft is meant to reduce token replay attacks
- Devices: devices registered or joined to Entra ID that your organization does not recognize
- MFA methods: authentication methods added or changed without the user’s knowledge
- Mailbox rules: rules that forward, move or delete mail, and automatic forwarding to external domains — the CISA SCuBA baseline for Exchange Online requires automatic forwarding to external domains to be disabled
- Conditional Access: exclusions, exceptions and coverage gaps in policies
- Roles and permissions: privileged role assignments and consent granted to applications — the CISA SCuBA baseline for Entra ID requires user consent to applications to be restricted
The review is part of the STANDARD and ADVANCED packages if your organization uses Microsoft 365 and Entra ID. Findings go into the audit report and remediation plan. If the review reveals traces of an active compromise, we recommend launching your incident response procedure.
For organizations that need only a tenant review, without an audit of on-premises Active Directory, we offer a separate service: the Microsoft 365 and Entra ID security review.
Who is this for?
This service is for you if:
- You have an Active Directory environment and want to assess its security
- You’re planning an AD migration or Azure AD / Entra ID deployment
- You’ve had an internal pentest with AD compromise and want to harden the environment
- You want to implement a Tiered Administration Model
- You need to meet NIS2/ISO 27001 requirements for identity management
Packages
BASIC
1 domain, up to 500 users:
- Basic assessment and enumeration
- Attack path analysis (BloodHound)
- PingCastle scoring
- Remediation roadmap
From €3,500 | 7 business days
STANDARD
1-2 domains, up to 2,000 users:
- Full assessment with attack paths
- Kerberos deep dive (Kerberoasting, AS-REP)
- GPO security review
- Azure AD integration (if applicable)
From €6,500 | 12 business days
ADVANCED
Multi-forest, up to 5,000 users:
- Full attack simulation
- Privilege escalation testing
- Trust relationship analysis
- IT workshop + re-audit after remediation
From €12,000 | 18 business days
Related Glossary Terms
Learn more about key concepts related to this service:
How we work
Our proven service delivery process.
Discovery
Environment information gathering, domain and forest trust identification
Enumeration
BloodHound data collection, LDAP queries, GPO, service accounts, Kerberos
Analysis
ACL/DACL, group membership, privileged accounts, password policies
Attack Path Analysis
Shortest path to DA, Kerberoasting, AS-REP Roasting, DCSync, Golden/Silver Ticket
Report & Remediation
Technical report, executive summary, remediation roadmap, IT workshop
Benefits for your business
What you gain by choosing this service.
Attack path map
BloodHound visualization — see exactly how attackers reach DA
PingCastle scoring
Numerical AD security score with industry benchmarks
Hardening plan
Prioritized actions with effort estimates and timelines
Knowledge transfer
Workshop with IT team — attack path demonstration and remediation
Related Articles
Expand your knowledge with our resources.
DDoS recommendation for ISPs no. 2026/67a/5: what it means for companies that are not internet providers
The Polish Government Plenipotentiary for Cybersecurity has updated the recommendation on protecting internet providers against DDoS. It is addressed to ISPs, but a company stops working when an attack hits its link or its provider. We translate the 15 points into questions for the ISP and actions on the company side.
Read more →PHP2Shell and Node2Shell: virtual patching before you deploy the fixes
Within two days CISA added two PHP flaws known as PHP2Shell and a Google Brotli decoder flaw called Node2Shell to its KEV catalog. We explain who is affected, which versions fix them and how virtual patching protects applications before the fixes reach every server.
Read more →Adversarial Exposure Validation (AEV): BAS vs automated pentesting vs CTEM
A year-old pentest report and thousands of scanner findings do not answer the board's question: would we stop an attack today? The Adversarial Exposure Validation category addresses that gap — here is how it differs from BAS, automated pentesting and CTEM.
Read more →Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Active Directory Security Audit.
What tools do you use for the AD audit?
BloodHound CE for attack path visualization, PingCastle for quick assessment and scoring, Purple Knight for security evaluation, and manual tools: PowerView, Rubeus, Mimikatz (PoC). All tools operate in read-only mode — we don't modify the environment.
Does the audit require a Domain Admin account?
No. A Domain Users account (read-only) is sufficient. For deeper analysis (deep dive), we optionally request a higher-privilege account, but the basic attack path audit is performed with minimal permissions.
How long does an AD audit take?
From 7 business days (1 domain, up to 500 users) to 24 business days (multi-forest, 5000+ users). A typical audit for a mid-size organization takes 2-3 weeks.
Do you cover Azure AD / Entra ID?
Yes — in Standard and higher packages. We analyze hybrid join, synchronization, conditional access policies and attack paths between on-prem AD and Azure AD.
What do we get in the report?
Executive summary with risk score, technical report with attack paths (BloodHound visualization), permissions audit, PingCastle scoring with benchmarks and a prioritized remediation roadmap with concrete steps.