Source Code Security Review
Fixing vulnerabilities in production costs 10x more than during development. We'll find SQL injection, XSS, business logic flaws. You get code to fix and secure your application against OWASP Top 10.

What is Source Code Security Review?
Source Code Security Review combines automated SAST scanning with expert manual analysis to find SQL injection, XSS, broken access control, and business logic flaws before they reach production — where fixing them costs 10x more. nFlo supports all major languages and frameworks, provides example fix code and CWE mapping for every finding, and offers developer support through remediation and verification.
Vulnerabilities in code are waiting to be discovered - by you or hackers
SAST + expertise = comprehensive security review
SAST
Automated code scanning for vulnerabilities
Manual Review
Expert review of business logic
Code to Fix
Specific examples how to fix each vulnerability
2 Million Customer Records Leaked Through SQL Injection
A fintech company lost their license and paid €800,000 GDPR fine. Attackers exploited SQL injection in login form - a vulnerability any SAST tool would detect in 5 minutes. Nobody reviewed the code before deployment.
Without source code security review:
- SQL injection, XSS, path traversal reach production
- Fixing in production costs 10x more than during development
- Risk of data leak, GDPR fines, reputation loss
- Developers repeat same mistakes in future projects
Automation + Expertise = We Find What Matters
SAST tools find obvious bugs. Experts find business logic flaws no tool can detect. We combine both approaches.
What you get:
- Report with OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities (SQL injection, XSS, broken auth…)
- Business logic analysis (broken access control, business logic flaws)
- Severity for each vulnerability (Critical, High, Medium, Low)
- Example fix code for each vulnerability
- Mapping to CWE/CVE and standards (OWASP, SANS Top 25)
- Developer support for fixes and verification
Who Is It For?
This service is for you if:
- You’re deploying new application and want to ensure it’s secure
- You need to meet PCI DSS, ISO 27001, SOC 2 requirements
- You inherited code from external team and want to know what’s there
- You experienced incident and want to check entire codebase
- You’re building application handling sensitive data (finance, health, PII)
What Vulnerabilities We Detect
OWASP Top 10
- A01 - Broken Access Control - unauthorized access to functions
- A02 - Cryptographic Failures - weak encryption, hardcoded credentials
- A03 - Injection - SQL injection, command injection, LDAP injection
- A04 - Insecure Design - business logic flaws
- A05 - Security Misconfiguration - default passwords, unnecessary features
- A06 - Vulnerable Components - outdated libraries with CVEs
- A07 - Auth Failures - authentication and session management errors
- A08 - Data Integrity Failures - missing input validation
- A09 - Logging Failures - missing logging of critical events
- A10 - SSRF - Server-Side Request Forgery
Business Logic Flaws
- Race conditions in financial transactions
- Authorization mechanism bypasses
- Discount/price calculation errors
- Workflow and business process manipulation
Supported Technologies
We work with most popular languages and frameworks:
- Backend: Java/Spring, .NET/C#, Python/Django, Node.js, PHP
- Frontend: React, Angular, Vue.js
- Mobile: Swift/iOS, Kotlin/Android, React Native
- Other: Go, Ruby, Rust
Example Vulnerabilities We Find
SQL Injection in Login
Vulnerable code (Java):
String query = "SELECT * FROM users WHERE username = '"
+ username + "' AND password = '" + password + "'";
Fix:
PreparedStatement stmt = conn.prepareStatement(
"SELECT * FROM users WHERE username = ? AND password = ?");
stmt.setString(1, username);
stmt.setString(2, password);
Hardcoded API Key
Vulnerable code (Python):
API_KEY = "sk_live_51ABC..." # Production key!
stripe.api_key = API_KEY
Fix:
import os
stripe.api_key = os.environ.get('STRIPE_API_KEY')
XSS in Template
Vulnerable code (JavaScript/React):
<div dangerouslySetInnerHTML={{__html: userInput}} />
Fix:
import DOMPurify from 'dompurify';
<div dangerouslySetInnerHTML={{__html: DOMPurify.sanitize(userInput)}} />
Broken Access Control
Vulnerable code (Node.js):
app.get('/api/users/:id/profile', (req, res) => {
const user = await User.findById(req.params.id);
res.json(user); // No check if requester can see this user!
});
Fix:
app.get('/api/users/:id/profile', (req, res) => {
if (req.user.id !== req.params.id && !req.user.isAdmin) {
return res.status(403).json({error: 'Forbidden'});
}
const user = await User.findById(req.params.id);
res.json(user);
});
Tools We Use
SAST (Static Analysis)
- SonarQube - multi-language scanner
- Checkmarx - enterprise SAST
- Semgrep - pattern-based analysis
- Snyk Code - real-time scanning
- CodeQL - semantic code analysis
Dependency Analysis
- OWASP Dependency-Check - CVE scanning
- Snyk - open source vulnerabilities
- npm audit / pip audit - package vulnerabilities
Manual Review
- IDE with security plugins
- Custom scripts for pattern detection
- Expert knowledge of common vulnerability patterns
Deliverables
Technical Report
For each vulnerability:
- Description - what it is and why it’s a problem
- Severity - Critical/High/Medium/Low (CVSS score)
- Location - file, line number, function
- Proof of Concept - how to exploit
- Fix code - specific example how to remediate
- References - CWE, OWASP, CVE links
Executive Summary
- Top 10 findings
- Overall security posture
- Risk assessment
- Compliance implications
- Recommended remediation timeline
Standards and Compliance
Source code review supports compliance with the requirements that increasingly mandate secure software development:
- PCI DSS (req. 6.2, 6.3) — secure development and review of application code
- NIS2 (art. 21) — security across the entire software supply chain
- ISO 27001 (A.8.25–A.8.28) — secure development life cycle and secure coding
- OWASP SAMM / ASVS — maturity and verification frameworks for application security
- SANS / CWE Top 25 — the most dangerous classes of software weaknesses
A code review works best as one element of a broader process. We combine it with penetration testing, IT vulnerability management, threat modeling, and security audits.
Related Glossary Terms
Learn more about key concepts related to this service:
Contact your account manager
Discuss Source Code Security Review with your dedicated account manager.

How we work
Our proven service delivery process.
Onboarding
Repository access, understanding architecture and business
SAST
Automated scanning of entire codebase
Manual Review
Manual review of logic, authentication, authorization
Report
Vulnerability list with severity, fix code, CWE
Remediation Support
Developer support for fixes and verification
Benefits for your business
What you gain by choosing this service.
10x Savings
Fixing before production is 10x cheaper
Avoid Data Leaks
Protect customer data and company reputation
Standards Compliance
Meet PCI DSS, ISO 27001, NIS2 requirements
Team Education
Developers learn secure coding practices
Related Articles
Expand your knowledge with our resources.
CVE-2026-56782: Gorse before 0.5.10 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in the /api/dump and /api...
Gorse before 0.5.10 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in the /api/dump and /api/restore endpoints that allows unauthenticated attackers to access protected functionality when admin_api_k...
Read more →CVE-2025-55017: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in...
Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in Apache IoTDB. This issue affects Apache IoTDB: from 2.0.0 before 2.0.6, from 1.0.0 before 1.3.6. Users...
Read more →CVE-2025-64152: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in...
Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in Apache IoTDB. This issue affects Apache IoTDB: from 1.0.0 before 1.3.6, from 2.0.0 before 2.0.7. Users...
Read more →Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Source Code Security Review.
What programming languages and frameworks do you support?
We work with Java/Spring, .NET/C#, Python/Django, Node.js, PHP, React, Angular, Vue.js, Swift/iOS, Kotlin/Android, Go, Ruby and Rust.
Do I get specific guidance on how to fix vulnerabilities?
Yes, for each vulnerability we provide example fix code, mapping to CWE/CVE and severity (Critical/High/Medium/Low). Additionally, we support developers with fixes and verify the corrections.
How long does the code review take and what does the timeline depend on?
The review takes 5-15 business days depending on the codebase size, number of languages and business logic complexity. We establish the exact schedule during the onboarding phase.
How does a code review differ from penetration testing?
Code review (SAST + manual review) analyzes the source code and detects vulnerabilities at the implementation level, including business logic flaws. Penetration testing tests the running application from the outside. The best results come from combining both approaches.