Skip to content
Knowledge base Updated: February 5, 2026

Conducting Simulated Phishing Campaigns: A Complete Guide

How to conduct simulated phishing campaigns. This nFlo article offers a guide discussing best practices in testing employee readiness for threats.

A simulated phishing campaign is a tool used to assess and raise employee awareness about phishing-related threats.

📚 Understand the threat first: what phishing is and how to protect against it — know the attack before you test your team’s resilience to it.

What is a Simulated Phishing Campaign?

📚 Read the complete guide: IAM / Zero Trust: Zarządzanie tożsamością i dostępem - od podstaw do Zero Trust

Definition of a Simulated Phishing Campaign

A simulated phishing campaign is a planned action aimed at mimicking real phishing attacks under controlled conditions. The purpose of such a campaign is to assess employee awareness and readiness to detect and respond to information extraction attempts. As part of this simulation, the organization sends fake emails or other communications that imitate real attacks, checking how many people will be deceived and click on suspicious links or share sensitive information.

Simulated phishing campaigns can include various types of attacks, such as spear phishing, whaling, or pharming. Spear phishing is targeted at specific people in the organization, often using detailed information that makes the attack appear more credible. Whaling is similar but is directed at senior management, while pharming involves redirecting users to fake websites.

The difference between real phishing and a simulated campaign lies in the controlled environment and educational nature of the latter. Simulated campaigns aim to teach employees to recognize threats and respond to them without the real risk of data or financial loss.

Brief History and Development of Simulated Phishing Campaigns

The first simulated phishing campaigns appeared along with the development of the internet and the increase in phishing attacks in the early 2000s. Initially, they were relatively simple, mainly consisting of sending basic phishing emails to employees. Over time, with the development of technology and increased awareness of cyber threats, simulated phishing campaigns became more advanced and complex.

Today, many organizations use specialized tools and platforms to conduct these campaigns, offering a wide range of features from designing realistic scenarios to advanced results analysis. The evolution of these tools and techniques reflects the growing importance of cybersecurity in today’s business world.

What are the Key Goals of Simulated Phishing Campaigns?

Raising Employee Awareness

One of the main goals of simulated phishing campaigns is employee education. In an era of increasingly sophisticated cyber attacks, people represent the weakest link in an organization’s security chain. Simulated phishing campaigns help increase employee awareness about phishing-related threats, teaching them how to recognize suspicious emails and what steps to take when they encounter something suspicious.

Employees acquire the skills necessary to identify various techniques used by cybercriminals, such as fake links, malicious attachments, or requests to disclose confidential information. Through regular campaigns, employees become more vigilant and less susceptible to manipulation.

Assessment of Current Security Procedures

Simulated phishing campaigns also serve to assess the effectiveness of current security procedures in the organization. By conducting such campaigns, organizations can identify weak points in their systems and processes. For example, if a large number of employees fall victim to a simulated attack, this may indicate the need to update security policies or conduct additional training.

Analysis of results from such campaigns allows assessment of which procedures work well and which need improvement. It is also possible to evaluate how effectively technical security systems, such as anti-phishing filters, protect employees against threats.

Improving Security Procedures and Policies

The results of simulated phishing campaigns provide valuable information that can help improve security policies and procedures. Based on identified weaknesses, organizations can implement changes that will increase their resistance to real attacks. This may include updating email usage policies, introducing new rules for reporting suspicious messages, or installing additional layers of technical security.

An example might be implementing two-factor authentication (2FA) as a standard login procedure, which significantly makes it harder for cybercriminals to take control of employee accounts even in case of password extraction.

What Benefits Do Simulated Phishing Campaigns Bring?

Increasing Organizational Resistance to Attacks

Regularly conducting simulated phishing campaigns increases organizational resistance to real attacks. Employees become more aware of threats and learn how to effectively respond to suspicious emails. As a result, the organization is less susceptible to successful phishing attacks, which can lead to serious financial losses, data loss, or reputation damage.

Organizations that regularly conduct such campaigns note significantly fewer successful phishing attacks. For example, in one study, companies that implemented regular phishing simulations noticed a drop in successful attacks by over 50% within a year.

Raising the Overall Security Level

Simulated phishing campaigns affect the overall security culture in the organization. Employees begin to treat security as an integral part of their daily work, which leads to increased overall organizational resistance to various types of cyber threats.

Through regular simulations, organizations can also better prepare for security audits and obtaining compliance certificates such as ISO 27001. Simulated phishing campaigns show that the organization actively works to raise the security level, which can be beneficial in contacts with customers and business partners.

Cost Effectiveness

Simulated phishing campaigns are also cost-effective. The cost of conducting such a campaign is negligible compared to potential losses resulting from a successful phishing attack. Costs mainly include purchasing appropriate tools and platforms, as well as time spent on conducting the campaign and analyzing results.

For example, the costs associated with a single successful phishing attack can amount to hundreds of thousands of dollars, including data loss, system repair, financial penalties, and reputation losses. In comparison, regular phishing campaigns are relatively inexpensive and can bring significant savings in the long run.

How to Prepare for Conducting a Simulated Phishing Campaign?

Identifying Campaign Goals and Scope

The first step in preparing a simulated phishing campaign is determining the campaign’s goals and scope. The organization should identify what goals it wants to achieve through the campaign – whether it’s about raising employee awareness, assessing security procedures, or perhaps identifying weak points in IT systems.

The target group for the campaign should also be defined. Will the campaign be directed at all employees, or only at selected departments or people in specific positions? It is important that the campaign is well-planned and tailored to the organization’s specifics and needs.

Gathering and Preparing Resources

The next step is gathering and preparing the necessary resources. The organization must choose appropriate tools and platforms for conducting the campaign. Various solutions are available on the market, offering a wide range of features from designing phishing scenarios to advanced results analysis.

Examples of tools include APT Defend, Cofense, or Proofpoint. The choice of tool depends on the organization’s specific needs and budget. It is also important to prepare the team responsible for conducting the campaign. This team should consist of security experts who have experience in conducting simulated phishing campaigns, as well as analysts who will be responsible for analyzing results.

Creating the Campaign Schedule

Creating the campaign schedule is a key element of preparation. The organization must determine the campaign duration and individual stages, including dates for sending simulated phishing emails. It is important that the campaign is spread over time and is not a one-time event. Regular simulations are more effective in raising employee awareness and readiness.

It should also be determined how often simulations will be conducted. Will these be quarterly, semi-annual, or annual campaigns? Regularity is key to maintaining a high level of awareness among employees.

What Tools and Technologies are Needed to Conduct a Simulated Phishing Campaign?

Overview of Available Tools

Various tools and technologies are available on the market that can support organizations in conducting simulated phishing campaigns. Here are some of the most popular:

  • APT Defend: A platform offering a wide range of features including designing phishing scenarios, automatic email sending, monitoring, and results reporting.

  • Cofense: A tool focused on employee education and training, offering realistic phishing scenarios and advanced results analysis.

  • Proofpoint: A solution providing complete campaign management from scenario design to analysis and reporting.

The choice of tool depends on the organization’s specific needs, budget, and technical requirements.

Integrating Tools with Existing IT Infrastructure

Integration of phishing simulation tools with existing IT infrastructure is crucial for campaign effectiveness. The organization must ensure that selected tools are compatible with its email systems, employee databases, and other key IT infrastructure elements.

Integration challenges may include security issues, such as ensuring that tools do not introduce additional risks to the organization. It is also important that tools are easy to use and do not require significant technical resources for implementation and maintenance.

Monitoring and Reporting

Monitoring and reporting functions are crucial for assessing the effectiveness of a simulated phishing campaign. The organization must track how employees respond to simulated attacks, what actions they take, and what the campaign results are.

Example reports include:

  • Number of phishing emails that were opened.

  • Number of clicks on suspicious links.

  • Number of employees who reported suspicious emails.

These metrics help assess how effective the campaign was and where there are areas for improvement.

How to Design an Effective Phishing Scenario?

Creating Realistic Scenarios

The key to an effective simulated phishing campaign is creating realistic scenarios that mimic real attacks. Scenarios should be based on current phishing trends and specific threats that may concern the particular organization.

Examples of realistic scenarios may include:

  • Fake emails from the IT department requesting password reset.

  • Emails pretending to be communications from management requesting the transfer of confidential information.

  • Notifications about fake invoices to be paid.

Attack Personalization

Attack personalization increases the effectiveness of simulated phishing campaigns. Examples of personalization include using employee names, their roles in the organization, and department-specific information. For example, an email directed to the finance department may contain a request to confirm payment, while a message to HR may contain a fake notification about changes in personnel policy.

Personalization makes phishing emails appear more credible, increasing the likelihood that employees will respond to them.

Testing Scenarios

Before launching the campaign, it is important to test scenarios to ensure they are realistic and effective. Testing may involve sending trial emails to a small group of employees and collecting feedback on their reactions.

Corrections based on tests are crucial to ensure the campaign will have the intended effect. Testing also helps identify potential technical problems and ensure that tools work as expected.

What are the Best Practices During a Simulated Phishing Campaign?

Transparency and Communication

Transparency and communication are crucial during simulated phishing campaigns. The organization should clearly communicate to employees the campaign’s purpose and that such activities will be conducted. While specific dates and scenario details may be hidden, general information about the campaign’s existence increases employee acceptance and trust in the organization’s activities.

The balance between transparency and realism is essential. On one hand, employees should be aware that such campaigns will take place; on the other hand, the element of surprise is key to assessing actual reaction to phishing.

Training and Education

Training and education before and after the campaign are crucial for its effectiveness. Before the campaign, the organization should conduct training on recognizing phishing and procedures for reporting suspicious emails. After the campaign ends, results should be discussed with employees, and additional training should be conducted if results indicate a need for improvement.

Effective education methods include interactive training, webinars, and regular reminders and updates on new phishing threats.

Continuous Improvement

Continuous improvement is crucial for maintaining a high level of security. The organization should regularly analyze results of simulated phishing campaigns and implement necessary corrections. Feedback from employees is a valuable source of information that can help improve future campaigns.

The role of feedback in the improvement process cannot be overestimated. Employees who feel engaged and heard are more likely to actively participate in security-related activities.

How to Analyze Results of a Simulated Phishing Campaign?

Collecting and Analyzing Data

Collecting and analyzing data is crucial for assessing the effectiveness of a simulated phishing campaign. This data may include the number of emails opened, clicks on suspicious links, reports of suspicious messages, and other metrics.

Results analysis should include both quantitative and qualitative data. Quantitative data provides information about the scale of the problem, while qualitative data, such as employee feedback, can help understand why some people fell victim to the simulated attack.

Results Interpretation

Interpreting results in the context of campaign goals is crucial. For example, if the campaign goal was to raise awareness, the organization should assess how well employees were able to recognize and report suspicious emails. If the goal was to assess security procedures, results should indicate which procedures worked and which needed improvement.

Examples of results analysis may include:

  • Assessment of which types of scenarios were most effective.

  • Identification of departments or roles that were most susceptible to phishing.

  • Assessment of the effectiveness of employee training and education.

Reporting and Presenting Results

Reporting results is crucial for ensuring that campaign information is used to improve security. Reports should be prepared in a clear and understandable manner, divided by results for different stakeholders such as management, IT department, or employees.

Best practices in presenting results include:

  • Using clear and understandable charts and tables.

  • Presenting key conclusions and recommendations.

  • Ensuring that reports are tailored to audience needs.

What Steps to Take After Completing a Simulated Phishing Campaign?

Campaign Summary and Feedback

After the campaign ends, the organization should conduct feedback sessions with employees. The goal is to discuss campaign results, identify areas for improvement, and collect suggestions for future activities.

Campaign conclusions may include:

  • Identification of the most susceptible employee groups.

  • Analysis of the effectiveness of different phishing scenarios.

  • Assessment of how effectively employees reported suspicious emails.

Implementing Changes and Corrections

Based on campaign results, the organization should implement necessary changes and corrections to security procedures. This may include updating security policies, introducing new rules for email usage, or installing additional security layers.

Examples of successful change implementations may include:

  • Introducing regular phishing training.

  • Changing password management policies.

  • Installing advanced anti-phishing filters.

Planning Next Campaigns

Planning next campaigns based on gained experience is crucial for maintaining a high level of security. The organization should regularly conduct simulated phishing campaigns to maintain employee awareness and adapt procedures to changing threats.

Setting new goals and strategies based on previous campaign results allows for continuous improvement and adaptation to new challenges in cybersecurity.

Summary

Simulated phishing campaigns are an invaluable tool in raising employee awareness, assessing security procedures, and improving organizational policies and procedures. Regularly conducting such campaigns increases organizational resistance to real phishing attacks, raises the overall security level, and is cost-effective.

Organizations that invest in regular phishing simulations are better prepared for cyber threats and can respond more quickly to new challenges. Implementing the described strategies and best practices will help organizations strengthen their position in the fight against cybercrime and protect valuable data from theft and loss.

Click rate is the wrong number to report

The click rate is the metric everyone asks for and the least useful one to act on. It moves with scenario difficulty, so a campaign can “improve” simply by being easier, and it says nothing about what the organisation would do if the click were real. Two other numbers carry the information. The report rate — what share of recipients told somebody — because a reported phish is a defence, while an unreported one is an unknown. And the time to first report, because it measures how long a real campaign would run before anyone noticed.

Those two also change the tone of the debrief. Reporting can be praised; clicking can only be punished, and punished people stop reporting. Designing campaigns around that distinction, and running them often enough for the trend to mean something, is what phishing simulations deliver as a service rather than as a one-off exercise.

Learn key terms related to this article in our cybersecurity glossary:

  • Ransomware — Ransomware is a type of malicious software (malware) that blocks access to a…
  • Phishing — Phishing is a type of social engineering attack that aims to deceive the victim…
  • Spear Phishing — Spear phishing is an advanced form of phishing in which attackers target…
  • Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity is a collection of techniques, processes, and practices used to…
  • Cybersecurity Incident Management — Cybersecurity incident management is the process of identifying, analyzing,…

Learn More

Explore related articles in our knowledge base:


Explore Our Services

Need cybersecurity support? Check out:


See also:

Share:

Talk to an expert

Have questions about this topic? Get in touch with our specialist.

Sales Representative
Grzegorz Gnych

Grzegorz Gnych

Sales Representative

Response within 24 hours
Free consultation
Individual approach

Providing your phone number will speed up contact.

Want to Reduce IT Risk and Costs?

Book a free consultation - we respond within 24h

Response in 24h Free quote No obligations

Or download free guide:

Download NIS2 Checklist