We offer a source code vulnerability analysis service for applications, which is performed based on best practices in secure software development and OWASP recommendations (ASVS and MASVS standards). Source code analysis can be supported by results from penetration tests.
As part of our work, we perform static source code analysis that covers the most important functionalities from a security perspective, including:
-
Application input and output handling
-
Data validation
-
Cryptographic mechanisms
-
Memory management
-
Error handling
-
Operating system calls
-
Logging
According to our methodology, our code reviews are performed in the following steps:
-
Conducting interviews with application architects or lead developers to obtain information about its business functions and internal structure,
-
Cleaning the source code from test code and unused code fragments, as well as marking external library code,
-
Performing static code analysis using automated tools to identify vulnerabilities detected by these tools,
-
Manual verification of results obtained from automated tools,
-
Supplementing the analysis with manual checks based on checklists describing various types of vulnerabilities appropriate for the programming language used,
-
Discussing work results with application architects or lead developers to determine vulnerability risk levels and the development team’s approach,
-
Preparing a report containing a list of identified vulnerabilities along with recommendations for their remediation.
What a review sees that a black-box test cannot
A test conducted from the outside can only find what is reachable through the interface. A source review reaches the rest: the authorisation check that exists in one controller and not in its neighbour, the secret committed two years ago and still valid, the dependency pinned to a version with a known flaw. These are classes of finding, not individual bugs — which is why a review typically changes how a team writes code rather than producing a one-off ticket list.
The scope and the standards applied are described in source code vulnerability review.
Related Terms
Learn key terms related to this article in our cybersecurity glossary:
- Cybersecurity — Cybersecurity is a collection of techniques, processes, and practices used to…
- IT Infrastructure Penetration Testing — IT infrastructure penetration testing is a controlled and ethical process of…
- Wi-Fi Network Penetration Testing — Wi-Fi network penetration testing is the process of assessing the security of…
- Penetration Testing — Penetration testing, also known as pentesting, is a controlled process of…
- Cybersecurity Incident Management — Cybersecurity incident management is the process of identifying, analyzing,…
Learn More
Explore related articles in our knowledge base:
- What is a CSRF vulnerability? Detection, action and prevention
- Active Directory Penetration Testing: Specifics, Techniques, and Attack Paths
- API and Web Services Security: How do you effectively protect the digital bridges that connect your applications and data?
- Common Security Vulnerabilities Detected During Penetration Testing
- Communication During Penetration Tests: How to Collaborate with Clients
Explore Our Services
📚 Read the complete guide: IAM / Zero Trust: Zarządzanie tożsamością i dostępem - od podstaw do Zero Trust
Need cybersecurity support? Check out:
- Vulnerability Management - continuous monitoring and remediation
- Penetration Testing - identify vulnerabilities in your infrastructure
Why this matters for organizations
Source code vulnerability analysis identifies security gaps in applications and increases software security. In the context of growing cyber threats and tightening regulations (NIS2, DORA), organizations must proactively manage this security area. Failure to implement adequate safeguards can lead to data breaches, financial penalties, and reputational damage.
Best practices for implementation
Effective implementation requires several key steps:
- Risk assessment and inventory — identify assets, threats, and vulnerabilities specific to your organization.
- Policy development — document requirements, roles, and responsibilities.
- Technical controls — deploy tools and configurations proportionate to identified risks.
- Training and awareness — engage employees in protecting organizational security.
- Monitoring and continuous improvement — regularly verify effectiveness and adapt to the evolving threat landscape.
